EFFICIENT MARKET THEORY
EFFICIENT MARKET THEORY
The efficient market hypothesis is a
central idea of a modern finance that has profound implications. An
understanding of the efficient market hypothesis will help to ask the right
questions and save from a lot of confusion that dominates popular thinking in
finance. An efficient market is one in which the market price of a security is
an unbiased estimate of its intrinsic value. Note that market efficiency does
not imply that the market price equals intrinsic value at every point in time.
A corollary is that investors will also
be less likely to discover great bargains and thereby earn extraordinary high
rates of return. The requirements for a securities market to be efficient
market are;
(1) Prices must be efficient
so that new inventions and better products will cause a firm s securities
prices to rise and motivate investors to supply capital to the firm (i.e., buy
its stock);
(2) Information must be
discussed freely and quickly across the nations so all investors can react to
new information;
(3) Transactions costs such as
sales commissions on securities are ignored;
(4) Taxes are assumed to have no
noticeable effect on investment policy;
(5) Every investor is allowed to
borrow or lend at the same rate; and, finally,
(6) Investors must be rational and able
to recognize efficient assets and that they will want to invest money where it
is needed most (i.e., in the assets with relatively high returns).
Forms of Efficient Market Hypothesis
Eugene Fama suggested that it is useful
to distinguish three levels of market efficiency. They are
1) Weak-form efficiency - Prices
reflect all information found in the record of past and volumes;
2) Semi-strong form
efficiency - Prices reflect not only all information found in the record of
past prices and volumes but also all other publicly available information;
3) Strongform efficiency -
Prices reflect all available information, public as well as private.
‘
Weak form of EMH
The week form of market holds that
present stock market prices reflect all known information with respect to past
stock prices, trends, and volumes. This form of theory is just the opposite of
the technical analysis because according to it, the sequence of prices
occurring historically does not have any value for predicting the future stocks
prices. The technical analysts rely completely on charts and past behavior of
prices of stocks.
Three types of tests have been commonly
employed to empirically verify the weak-form efficient market hypothesis: (a)
serial correlation tests; (b) runs tests; and (c) filter rules tests.
Serial Correlation Test: Serial
Correlation is said to measure the association of a series of numbers
which are separated by some constant time period. One way to test for
randomness in stock price changes is to look at their serial correlations. Is
the price change in one period correlated with the price change in some other
period? If such auto-correlations are negligible, the price changes are
considered to be serially independent. Numerous serial correlation studies,
employing different stocks, different time-lags, and different time-periods,
have been conducted to detect serial correlations
Run Test: Ren
Test was also made by Fama to find out it price changes were likely to be followed
by further price changes of the same sign. Run Test ignored the absolute values
of numbers in the series and took into the research only the positive and
negative signs. Given a series of stock price changes, each price (+) id it
represents an increase or a minus (-) if it represents a decrease. A run occurs
when there is not difference between the sign of two changes. When the sign of
change differs, the run ends and a new run begin. To test a series of price
changes for independence, the number of runs in that series is compared to see
whether it is statistically different from the number of runs in a purely
random series of the same size. Many studies have been carried out, employing
the runs test of independence. They did not detect any significant relationship
between the returns of security in one period and the returns in prior periods
and made a conclusion that the security prices followed a random walk.
Filter Rules Test: The use
of charts is essentially a technique for filtering out the important information
from the unimportant. Alexander and Fama and Blume took the idea that price and
volume data are supposed to tell the entire story we need to know to identify
the important action in stock prices. They applied filter rules to see how well
price changes pick up both trends and reverses which chartists claim their
charts do. If a stock moves up X per cent, buy it and hold it long; if it then
reverses itself by the same percentage, sell it and take a short position in
it.
Semi-Strong Form of EMH
The semi strong form of the efficient
market hypothesis centers on how rapidly and efficiently market prices adjust
to new publicly available information. In this state, the market reflects even
those forms of information which may be concerning the announcement of a firm s
most recent earnings forecast and adjustments which will have taken place in
the prices of security. The investor in the semi-strong form of the market will
find it impossible to earn a return on the portfolio which is based on the
publicly available information in excess of the return which may be said to be
commensurate with the portfolio risk. Many empirical studies have been made on
the semi-strong form of the efficient market hypothesis to study the reaction
of security prices to various types of information around the announcement time
of the information. Two studies commonly employed to test semi-strong form
efficient market are event study and portfolio study.
Event Study examines
the market reactions to and the excess market returns around a specific information
event like acquisition announcement or stock split. The key steps involved in
an event study are as follows:
1. Identify the event to be
studied and pinpoint the date on which the event was announced.
2. Collect returns
data around the announcement date. In this context two issues have to be
resolved: What should be the period for calculating returns weekly, daily, or
some other interval? For how many periods should returns be calculated before
and after the announcement date?
3. Calculate the
excess returns, by period, around the announcement date for each firm in the
sample. The excess return is calculated by making adjustment for market
performance and risk.
4. Compute the average and
the standard error of excess returns across all firms
5. Assess whether the excess
returns around the announcement date are different from zero. To determine
whether the excess returns around the announcement date are different from
zero, estimate the T statistic for each day. The results of event studies are
mixed. Most event studies support the semi-strong from efficient market
hypothesis. Several event studies, however, have cast their shadow over the
validity of the semi strong form efficient markets theory.
Portfolio study: In a
portfolio study, a portfolio of stocks having the observable characteristic (low
price earnings ratio or whatever) is created and tracked over time see whether
it earns superior risk-adjusted returns. Steps involved in a portfolio study
are as follows:
1. Define the variable
(characteristic) on which firms will be classified. The proposed investment
strategy spells out the relevant variable. The variable must be observable, but
not necessarily numerical.
2. Classify firms into
portfolios based upon the magnitude of the variable. Collect data on the
variable for every firm in the defined universe at the beginning of the period
and use that information for classifying firms into different portfolios.
3. Compute the returns
for each portfolio on the returns for each firm in each portfolio for the
testing period and calculate the return for each portfolio, assuming that the
stocks included in the portfolio are equally weighted.
4. Calculate the excess
returns for each portfolio. The calculation of excess returns earned by a
portfolio calls for estimating the portfolio beta and determining the excess
returns
Assess whether the average excess
returns are different across the portfolios. Several statistical tests are
available to test whether the average excess returns differ across these
portfolios. Some of these tests are parametric and some nonparametric. Many
portfolio studies suggest that it is not possible to earn superior riskadjusted
returns by trading on some observable characteristics. However, several
portfolio studies have documented inefficiencies and anomalies.
Strong-Form of EMH
The strong-form efficient market
hypothesis holds that all available information, public or private, is
reflected in the stock prices. The strong form is concerned with whether or not
certain individuals or groups of individuals possess inside information which
can be used to make above average profits. If the strong form of the efficient
capital market hypothesis holds, then and day is as good as any other day to
buy any stock. This the most extreme form of the efficient market hypothesis.
Most of the research work has indicated that the efficient market hypothesis in
the strongest form does not hold good.
Market Efficiency and Anomalies
Anomalies are situations that appear to
violate the traditional view of market efficiency, suggesting that it may be
possible for careful investors to earn abnormal returns. Some stock market
anomalies are Low Price-Earnings Ratio: Stock that are selling at price
earnings ratios that are low relative to the market Low Price-Sales Ratio:
Stocks that have price-to-sales ratios that are lower competed with other
stocks in the same industry or with the overall market. Low Price-to Book value
Ratio: Stocks whose stock prices are less that their respective book values
High Divident Yield: Stocks that pay high dividends relative to their
respective share prices Small companies: Stock of companies whose market
capitalization is less than 100 million Neglected Stocks: Stocks followed by
only a few analysts and/or stocks with low percentages of institutional
ownership Stocks with High Relative Strength: Stocks whose prices have risen
faster relative to the overall market January Effect: Stock do better during
January than during any other month of the year Day of the Week:
Stock of poorer during Monday than
during other days of the week Most of these anomalies appear to revolve around
four themes:
1. Markets tend to overreact to news,
both good and bad.
2. Value investing is contrarians
in nature and is beneficial because markets overreact.
3. The market consistently ignores
certain stocks, especially small stocks.
Let us examine what anomalies
mean for investors and the concept of market efficiency.
Financial Market Overreaction: One of
the most intriguing issues to emerge in the past few years is the
notion of market overreaction to new information (both positive and negative).
Many practitioners have insisted for years that markets to overreact. Recent
statistical evidence for both the market as a whole and individual security has
shown errors in security prices that are systematic and therefore predictable.
Overreactions are sometimes called reversals. Stocks that perform poorly in
period suddenly reverse direction and start performing well in a subsequent
period, and vice versa. Several studies have found that stock returns over
longer time horizons (in excess of one year) display significant negative
serial correlation.
Profiting from Reversals: Market
overreactions or reversals suggest several possible investment
strategies to produce abnormal profits. Some possibilities include buying last
year s worst performing stocks, avoiding stocks with high P/E rations, or
buying on bad news. At the risk of oversimplifying, any investment strategy
based on market overreaction represents a contrarian approach to invest, buying
what appears to be out of favour with most investors.
Calendar-Based Anomalies: Are
there better times to own stocks than others? Should you avoid
stocks on certain days? The evidence seems to suggest that several
calendar-based anomalies exist. The two best known, and widely documented, are
the weekend effect and the January effect.
Weekend
Effect: Studies of daily returns began with the
goal of testing whether the markets operate on calendar time
or trading time. In other words, are returns for Mondays (i.e., returns over
Friday-to-Monday periods) different from the other day of the week returns? The
answer to the question turned out to be yes, the trend was called the weekend
effect. Monday returns were substantially lower than other daily returns. One
study found that Mondays produced a mean return of almost-35 percent. By
contrast, the mean annualized returns on Wednesdays was more than +25 per cent.
The
January Effect: Stock returns appear to exhibit seasonal return
patterns as well. In other words, returns are systematically
higher in some months than in others. Initial studies found that returns were
higher in January for all stocks (thus this anomaly was dubbed the January
effect) whereas later studies found the January effect was more pronounced for
small stocks than for large ones. One widely accepted explanation for the
January effect is tax-loss selling by the investors at the end of December.
Because this selling pressure depresses prices at the end of the year, it would
be reasonable to expect a bounce-back in prices during January. Small stocks,
the argument goes, are more susceptible to the January effect because their
prices are more volatile, and institutional investors (many of whom are
tax-exempt) are less likely to invest in shares of small companies.
Calendar-Based Trading
Strategies: Both seasonal and day-of-the-week affects are inconsistent
with market efficiency because both suggest that historical information can
generate abnormal profits. As will all anomalies, however, a more important
issue is whether seasonal and/ or day-of-the-week effects can create profit
opportunities for investors.
Small-Firm Effect: Generally
the stocks of small companies substantially outperform stocks of large
companies. Of course, history has also shown that small stocks have exhibited
more year-to-year variation than large stocks. However, even after correcting
for differences in risk, some studies suggest that investors can earn abnormal
profits by investing in shares of small companies, exploiting the small-firm
effect. Two explanations for the small-firm effect seem plausible to us. The
first is that analysts have applied the wrong risk measures to evaluate returns
from small stocks. Small stocks may well be riskier than these traditional risk
measures indicate.
Performance of Investment Professionals: Investment
professionals such as mutual fund managers seem to have a difficult
time beating the overall market. In a particular year, some professionals will
beat the market, whereas others will not. The key question is whether some
professionals can consistently outperform the market. Some evidence suggests
that the answer to this question may be yes.
Comments
Post a Comment